There’s a common idea out there that great discoveries are made by lone geniuses working in isolation. Their ideas are written off by the narrow minded scientific establishment, and the public suffers as a result. The truth is that most advances in science are incremental and carried out by scientists working within the accepted framework of academia, industry, or government.
Occasionally
there are great leaps, and those ideas do tend to start out as fringe science. But
when an idea is right, it will stand up to repeated testing while previously
accepted ideas fail. The scientific community will eventually recognize the
truth of it. The process is slow, but it works.
But isn’t the public harmed because the fringe
idea wasn’t immediately accepted? Well, no. The vast majority of fringe science
is flat out wrong and often dangerous. Caution about accepting new ideas is how
we make sure that only the good ideas get through. Delaying the acceptance of
new medical treatments hurts those who have to wait for the improvements, but
implementing untested harmful treatments would be much worse.
Even
trusting geniuses is not a good way to go. Linus Pauling did some
unquestionably brilliant work, but his ideas about vitamin C as a medical
treatment were completely wrong. Science is successful because of its process and
not the genius of individual scientists. I worry that Fringe teaches the exact opposite lesson.
Putting
fringe science on the same level as established science is why some parents
won’t vaccinate their children against potentially lethal diseases. It’s why
some cancer patients will pass up conventional treatment in favor of homeopathy
or a special diet. The next fringe cure you hear about may indeed work, but the
odds are greatly against it. When I fall ill, I will bet my life on the
scientific consensus, and I hope you'll do the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment